Tony Bingham gave us a light-hearted Christmas reminder of the benefits of the employer having on site people who understand the sharp end of construction (14 December, page 56).
I could not agree more. JCT contracts call that person a 鈥渃lerk of works鈥 and apparently give them no direct role in the administration of the contract. Odd. It鈥檚 also true that the NEC contracts, used successfully and increasingly in the building and infrastructure sectors in the UK and internationally, does not have a contractual role called 鈥渃lerk of works鈥.
However, as I am sure Mr Bingham is more than aware, the ECC, used by countless members of the NEC Users鈥 Group, does have give a clear role to the 鈥渟upervisor鈥. That role within the contract is focused on compliance: ensuring the contractor delivers what it has promised through testing and the identification and management of defects. This is a clear and very important role for a 鈥渃lerk of works鈥.
To suggest that the Olympic Delivery Authority, in choosing to use a modern form of contract as it did, 鈥渄ecided to save money by cutting out the clerk of works鈥 is just a fraction disingenuous! The Institute of Clerks of Works need not fear the NEC!
Richard Patterson, procurement and NEC specialist, Mott MacDonald
No comments yet