In these topsy-turvey times subbies think they鈥檙e designers, QSs act like lawyers and architects let builders specify. Wouldn鈥檛 it be refreshing if we stuck to our job descriptions in 2007?

Had enough Christmas quizzes? What about a new year鈥檚 resolution instead? How about 2007 becoming the year when architects do the drawings, do the engineering, contractors do as they鈥檙e told, quantity surveyors do the bean counting, and customers do the paying?

The new year鈥檚 resolution for you architects is: 鈥淭his year I will insist that appointments require me to do all the drawings, detailing, specifying and inspecting鈥.

There鈥檚 more. 鈥淭his year, the structural on his professional services contract will do all the drawings and detailing and, damn it, even the engineering calculations and the specification of the steelwork鈥. And there鈥檚 more. 鈥淭his year the mechanical engineering consultant will do all the drawings and detailing and, damn it, even the air-con calculations and duct sizes.鈥 And there鈥檚 more yet. 鈥淭his year contractors will do as they are told in all those drawings and details and specifications, and the architect will damn well check to see it does.鈥

鈥淏ingham,鈥 said one of my pals, 鈥測ou must be joking. The job of the architect is to transfer the work and the risk to the next bloke. In any case, architects have forgotten how to do all the drawings and details and specifying.鈥 So, too, engineers. But the fee for architects is too low to get them weaving on all that detailing malarkey. Hmm, well that's why 2007 is the year that customers have to do the paying.

How about 2007 being the year contractors become builders and do as they are told? The new year resolution for you contractors is to receive all the drawings and details and specifications from the 2007 architect and then gawp. At the end of the gawping period you decide two things at least: 鈥淐an I build what is on the drawings, in the details, on the specification? And if so, for how much?鈥



Credit: Simone Lia

鈥楾he job of the architect is to transfer the work and the risk to the next bloke. In any case, they鈥檝e forgotten how to do all the drawings鈥


The 2007 promise is a simple proposition: the architect and engineer say what is to be built and a builder says it can build it and for how much. No promise is made by the builder to fill the gaps in the design, detail and specification jigsaw. The jigsaw, which arrives for pricing by the builder, has no bits missing. Bridges are designed by engineers and builders promise they can build them. Two separate games.

If the design and detail, or even the choosing of materials or products or systems, is passed from the architect to the contractor, it creates a hostage to fortune. 鈥淒esign development鈥 by the contractor is a mistake for the customer. Truth is, the contractor doesn鈥檛 actually fill the gaps at all. It invariably contracts out the gap-filling to the subcontractors. They too are invited to make a 2007 resolution: 鈥淚 promise not to pretend I am qualified to draw, design, detail and choose materials. I promise not to promise the end result will be fit for a particular purpose 鈥 mainly because I don鈥檛 know what that means. I will instead repeat every day 鈥業 am a putter-upperer (a very good putter-upperer), and that鈥檚 all鈥.鈥

And what of the QSs? How about 2007 being the year for being a QS again, instead of being a lawyer? Do you remember when a QS also received all the drawings and details and specification from the architect? And do you remember, well before inviting prices from real builders, the QS got the 鈥渄im鈥 (dimension) paper out of the cupboard? And then you QSs did the 鈥渢aking-off鈥 and the dotting-on and the working up? Do you remember poring over the standard method of measurement? And real QSs even used duodecimals! But when the architects passed the parcel the QS had nothing more to do. So they started poring over contract documents. They had suits made with pockets big enough to take a JCT63 then 80 then 98 then a 2005. The QS stopped counting. The QS has become a lawyer.

Now I have it. Everyone has been playing musical chairs.

When the music stops the subby was sitting in the chair marked 鈥渄esigner鈥. The architect was sat in the chair saying 鈥淚 want no risk鈥. The engineer blokes were sat on the chair that says, 鈥淟et the contractor design the M&E work鈥, the QS is sat on the chair marked 鈥渓awyer鈥. And guess whose playing the music? Guess who鈥檚 running the quiz? I am not going to say 鈥 I鈥檓 rummaging in my CD case and trying to think of a 2007 new year resolution for myself.

Topics