The latest published yesterday tell us practically nothing about the prospects for the industry over the year ahead, other than things don鈥檛 appear to be getting worse and that we are still a huge distance from where we were three or four years ago.
Why then does our housing minister feel the need to pump up the value of what really are still very flaccid figures for housing starts?
He tweeted: 鈥淭hese better house building stats welcome, but this is just the start of the story. Much more to do鈥� and provided this useful link to that well-known house of statistical expertise .
Its considered opinion was: 鈥淪igns of recovery for housing industry after 25 per cent rise in number of new homes started鈥�.
Are there really signs of recovery in these figures?
Let鈥檚 put all this in context.
One quarter鈥檚 figures without heavy interpretation and rather a lot of educated guessing tell us not a great deal when you have the confusion of unusually bad weather, a major shift in the way house builders are approaching production, the effect of a bounce back after a near shutdown and confusing factors around where and how the Olympic Village will be slotted into the numbers of homes started or built.
Leaving those problems to one side, let鈥檚 take a look at a graph from the non-seasonally adjusted figures produced by the communities department DCLG (see above).
How do you read this graph?
For my money it says a few things.
Yep, starts are on the way up, but from a level that if it were it sustained would have meant a further collapse in completions. On an annualized basis (the blue line) starts are now roughly on a par with completions (the black line) which suggests the building pipeline is getting closer to rebalancing itself 鈥� what some might very loosely regard as analogous to restocking.
On a six-month rolling basis (the red line) interestingly the figures hint at a downward correction from a bit of an earlier surge, rather than a surge from an earlier low as suggested by the quarterly figures. But I wouldn鈥檛 get too bothered over that. The broad pattern doesn鈥檛 point to a fall.
And finally on an annualised basis we see housing completions finally shifting up. Well about time too.
None of this screams 鈥渞ecovery鈥� to me and certainly not when there are so many factors that are clouding the issue.
So I am with on this when he tweeted in response to Mr Shapps鈥檚 rather upbeat interpretation of the figures: 鈥淧remature on housebuilding surge? Yes CLG Q1 is up 16% on 2010, but NHBC starts for Feb to Apr are down 16%鈥︹��
And for those that follow tweets there are further interesting points made by Mr Oliver and of the Construction Products Association on the figures
As many a hardened investors might quip: 鈥淕reen shoots are for pandas.鈥�
No comments yet