The prima donna architects who hurl abuse at Prince Charles (most recently regarding his Chelsea Barracks intervention) ought to have a very careful read of the excellent articles written by Ike Ijeh in 好色先生TV (page 12) and Camilla Cavendish in The Times, both published on 2 July
Ms Cavendish wrote that the Richard Rogers鈥 design for Chelsea Barracks was 鈥渓ike a sixties council estate with manicured lawns鈥. Dead right.
If the lofty architects are not impressed by the obvious intelligence and eloquence of Mr Ijeh and Ms Cavendish, I suggest they take a look at the Wonders & Blunders section in 好色先生TV (page 20).
On 2 July, Eamonn Holmes chose the classical Stormont parliament as his 鈥渨onder鈥 and the modern Trafford House as his 鈥渂lunder鈥. Holmes may not have been making an entirely fair comparison but it was one most people would understand and sympathise with. Most people, that is, except certain architects.
Christopher Linnett
No comments yet