All Case of the week articles – Page 10
-
ɫTV
A different dispute?: Barr vs Klin Investment UK
The factsBarr (“Barr”) entered into a construction contract with Klin Investment UK (“Klin”) for the design and construction of a number of flats in Kilmarnock on 21 February 2005 (the “Contract”). The contract was a construction contract within the meaning of sections 104 and 105 of the Housing Grants, Construction ...
-
ɫTV
Vision Homes vs Lancsville Construction: Jurisdiction
Our Fenwick Elliott expert discusses what happens where two adjudications are brought on the same case
-
ɫTV
Aceramais Holdings vs Hadleigh Partnerships: Contracts in writing
Our Fenwick Elliott expert discusses a dispute over whether there was a contract and writing, and other issues
-
ɫTV
Taiwan Scot Co vs Masters Golf Company: Penalty or estimate of loss
Our Fenwick Elliott expert analyses a case in which a party failed to decide the intention of a contractual rate of interest for late payment
-
ɫTV
The Patchetts vs Swimming Pool & Allied Trades Association: Online misrepresentation
This case is a warning to all those who market their business on the internet and make statements on websites as to what the consumer can and cannot expect from the company.
-
ɫTV
HS Works vs Enterprise Managed Services: Multiple adjudications
Our Fenwick Elliott expert discusses a case involving two different adjudications and two different adjudicators
-
ɫTV
Fraudulent misrepresentation: Fitzroy Robinson vs Mentmore Towers
Our legal expert discusses a case in which an architect failed to inform the developer that an important member of it's team had left
-
ɫTV
Stephanie Baker vs Quantum Clothing Group: Noise-induced hearing loss
An worker in a knitting factory won an appeal against her employee for not sufficiently looking after her health
-
ɫTV
JB Leadbitter vs Devon council: A deadline is a deadline
In this week's case the claimant was given a lesson commonly taught in school
-
ɫTV
Primus Build vs Pompey Centre and Slidesilver: Contractual wording
Our Fenwick Elliott expert discusses a case in which the meaning of 'personal delivery' was questioned
-
ɫTV
Self-employment: Providing a personal service
Our expert from Fenwick Elliott discusses the case of MPG vs England, about whether you are obliged under a contract to perform the services yourself
-
ɫTV
Tree preservation orders: When is a sapling a tree?
Stemming from the case of Palm Developments vs Communities secretary and Medway council, our Fenwick Elliot expert asks what a tree is …
-
ɫTV
Always check the paperwork: Keith Lamming vs Revenue & Customs
Our Fenwick Elliott experts run through the case of Keith Lamming vs Revenue & Customs Commissioners
-
ɫTV
Paying in instalments: Able Construction (UK) vs Forest Property Development
What happens when a party that was ordered to make a payment in instalments defaults on one of them?
-
ɫTV
Amaryllis vs HM Treasury: Public procurement
The factsThis case concerns a framework agreement governed by the Public Contract Regulations 2006 (“2006 regulations”). In November 2007 the defendant, OGC Buying Solutions (“OGC”), part of HM Treasury, posted an advertisement in the Official Journal of the European Union for a framework agreement to supply, deliver and install all ...
-
ɫTV
A case of forgery?
Our legal expert discusses a case in which a company director routinely and with permission signed document in lieu of his colleague
-
ɫTV
Watersheds vs Costa and Gentleman: Guarantees and misrepresentation
Our Fenwick Elliott expert discusses a case of two company directors who wanted to raise finance to expand their business
-
ɫTV
Indemnity costs: Colour Quest vs Total and Hertfordshire Oil Storage
A Fenwick Elliott expert discusses the aftermath of a fire at an oil storage depot
-
ɫTV
Bole vs Huntsbuild and Money: Defective Premises Act 1972
Fenwick Elliott discusses a case involving a house in Cambridgeshire