好色先生TV

This time last year, David Fison, the chief executive of Skanska UK, announced that his firm had made a loss of 拢41.5m, largely because of two PFI hospitals in the east Midlands.

The same day in Skanska鈥檚 Stockholm headquarters, the board held a meeting with Mats Williamson, the 51-year-old head of Skanska Sweden. He was given a simple task. 鈥淭hey told me we鈥檇 meet in 12 months, and the UK business would have returned to profit. It wasn鈥檛 specified how.鈥�

That may sound like a good premise for a reality TV show, but nobody in Skanska found it entertaining. Fison went and Williamson arrived to bring the wayward UK operation to heel.

He had been in the UK several months earlier as part of a high-level group sent in to help the floundering subsidiary but when asked what went wrong with Fison鈥檚 regime, Williamson restricts himself to stating the obvious: 鈥淲e took on too many risks and they materialised.鈥� The discretion is characteristic: he may be 6鈥�5鈥�, but steps delicately around contentious subjects.

Others have been blunter, and blame Fison鈥檚 management style. One says: 鈥淪wedes take decisions before a meeting and only meet to ratify it in a way that appears consensual. When David was at Balfour Beatty he embodied that company鈥檚 hard-headed culture but became extremely deferential and polite at Skanska without understanding that decisions were needed. He became more Swedish than the Swedes.鈥�

Another says Skanska lacked a succession plan after Keith Clarke, its previous chief executive, left for Atkins in 2003. 鈥淜eith was at the top of his game but that doesn鈥檛 mean he had a strong team around him.鈥�

Williamson shakes his head at those claims and points out that Fison resigned. (The latter, in his interview with 好色先生TV last week, said he was given no choice). He reveals a more steely side when asked why he was the best candidate for the UK job.

鈥淭here were others but I was the one who could give the biggest guarantee things would improve. With me there was a strong sense the status quo would not remain.鈥�

When he arrived at the firm鈥檚 Hertfordshire office, his first move was to bring its operating units closer together and, more importantly, closer to him. He paints the picture of a loosely organised company where communication was irregular. 鈥淵ou had operating units out on their own and directors didn鈥檛 meet that often,鈥� he says.

One ex-employee agrees more cohesion was needed. He says: 鈥淪kanska in the UK was born out of Trafalgar House, which had a dog-eat-dog culture.鈥� By contrast, Williamson takes head office鈥檚 more enlightened view that one person鈥檚 problem is everyone鈥檚.

And those risky projects? He picks up a business card and drops it through his fingers onto the table: this is what happens to a project that doesn鈥檛 hit obstacles. 鈥淲e now have a project review team. If the project falls all the way to the bottom, you can do it. If it stops on the way down, you need to explain why it should go ahead.鈥�

Those who know Williamson say he will go far. One says: 鈥楾he jury is out on the UK operation but Mats is an absolutely top-drawer individual鈥�

It has been an inward-looking first year for the man who, during his early career as a civil engineer, built the 16km 脰resund bridge between Sweden and Denmark. Many have wondered how Skanska will react to getting so badly stung in the Midlands. The comeback, says Williamson, is continuing.

Skanska is still chasing 好色先生TV Schools for the Future (BSF) projects, despite losing out to Kier on a 拢477m deal in Kent, which one source said 鈥渟eriously hurt鈥�. It has won a BSF contract in Bristol but still needs more sizeable wins to gain a decent foothold.

And is there life in PFI after the Nottingham and Derby hospital debacles? Or will Skanska retreat wounded? 鈥淣o,鈥� he says firmly. 鈥淭here will be good opportunities.鈥�

One fellow chief executive thinks he鈥檒l have his work cut out. 鈥淭hey鈥檝e lost ground in PFI and are up against highly competitive animals in Balfour Beatty and Carillion,鈥� he says. Williamson only began plotting the future in recent months and will do no more than hint at what he鈥檚 thinking. For example, on UK infrastructure: 鈥淕iven the time people spend in their cars, queuing, the water pipe leaks and the risk of energy blackouts, you need to invest.鈥�

The only thing he can say with any certainty is that he鈥檒l boost the company鈥檚 already sound green credentials. He reverts frequently to the mantra of green construction and draws on a piece of paper to show how the company will do more in the 鈥渟uper-green鈥� sector; he adds that he has even introduced a green-only policy for company cars 鈥� even though 鈥渢he green interest here is far less than in Sweden鈥�.

Beyond that, he is in no rush to make decisions and clearly adheres to the 鈥渢urnover is vanity, profit is sanity鈥� school, despite acknowledging that the UK market has the biggest room for growth for Skanska outside the US. 鈥淵ou could argue we鈥檙e big enough as a global company,鈥� he says.

Those who know Williamson say he will go far. One says: 鈥淭he jury is out on the UK operation but Mats is an absolutely top-drawer individual. Skanska couldn鈥檛 have chosen better.鈥� Even Fison acknowledges that he is a 鈥済reat bloke鈥�. He adds: 鈥淗e鈥檚 very down to earth and probably one of the most respected and trusted top guys at Skanska.鈥�

And those that don鈥檛 know him concede that Skanska has sharpened its act over the past year and is no longer 鈥渃hasing everything鈥�, which presumably relates to the business card trick.

So, after 28 years with Europe鈥檚 third biggest contractor, could Williamson eventually land the top job in Stockholm? Johan Karlstrom, the global chief, spent four years fixing North America before moving upstairs. 鈥淭hat鈥檚 not what I鈥檓 thinking about at the moment,鈥� he says, adding that he鈥檒l be in the UK for a few years yet. 鈥淢aybe that鈥檚 a difference in Swedish culture. People don鈥檛 say this or that will look good on my CV.鈥�

Perhaps, but a resurgent UK business certainly wouldn鈥檛 hurt, nor will the fact that he last week announced a 拢15m profit.