好色先生TV

While the last five years have been tough for everyone in the construction industry, they have perhaps been especially hard for architects. According to the RIBA, workloads fell 40% from the pre-recession peak and staff
levels in architecture firms dropped by 30%.

And that 10 percentage point differential was and remains particularly bad news for recent graduates. In other words, there is still a decent amount of slack in the system and consequently few places for young architects seeking their first or second job.

So, given the scarcity of jobs, how can relatively inexperienced designers ensure that they stand out from the crowd?

One answer is building information modelling (BIM). According to Adrian Dobson, director of practice at the
RIBA, young architects with strong BIM credentials are currently finding it significantly easier to get their foot in the door than their less technologically-minded colleagues.

鈥淓ach generation is always more comfortable with new technology,鈥� he says. 鈥淚 think that it might not be the most rewarding work, but it could be an entry point to the profession. The older members of a team may not have those skills.鈥�

So, how are UK architecture schools treating the emergence of BIM? How critical do they see it to their students鈥� professional development? And is this something that is best embedded at an undergraduate or postgraduate level?

We asked heads of three of the country鈥檚 most prominent architecture departments for their views.

Dr Andrew Crompton

Head of department at the University of Liverpool鈥檚 school of architecture

Liverpool currently includes two or three lectures on BIM within its undergraduate programme and is launching an MSc in BIM in September, which will be available at both its Liverpool home and its London campus.

鈥淎t undergraduate level I think that BIM is an area that anybody going into the profession needs to be aware of and I think that鈥檚 true of nearly everyone in practice. Nearly every architect I know understands what it is and uses it.

鈥淚 think that people in the profession would benefit from doing our new MSc. We hope to attract people from quite a wide range of backgrounds who would benefit from knowing about BIM for their work. We expect that it will be mostly trained architects who will take the course, but it is open to engineers and other people. BIM is something that is blurring the boundaries between professions. At the moment it鈥檚 project planners and surveyors who are running the building process because they鈥檙e in charge of the money. But with this new unified system where everybody shares information there are possibilities for other people to take the lead in development. I don鈥檛 think that architects should miss that chance.

Some of them have doubled their wage by being BIM-literate

鈥淢any people think that BIM inhibits the possibilities of design because it makes changes hard to make and it leads you down certain familiar design routes, but our BIM professor, Arto Kiviniemi, disagrees with that and says that you can use it in very creative ways. We hope that people who learn from him can learn to use it in a more imaginative way. It鈥檚 more a problem with the stage we鈥檙e at in the implementation of BIM than with the technology itself.鈥�

Professor Paul Jones

Director of architecture, Northumbria University

Northumbria currently introduces students to BIM via training on software applications such as Revit or ArchiCAD. The school is currently considering how it can introduce a postgraduate BIM-specific MSc in the most effective 鈥渞eal world鈥� way.

鈥淚n terms of employability, the students that we have who have done some Revit in their year out after their undergraduate training and have continued building on it in their Part 2, when they鈥檝e gone out into practice they鈥檝e tended to put anything between 拢10,000 and 拢30,000 on their wages. Some of them have doubled their wage by being BIM-literate. They鈥檝e gone in as bright people who can help a practice to become BIM-enabled.

鈥淔rom this year we鈥檙e doing BIM at an undergraduate level. For the past two or three years it鈥檚 been done at a postgraduate level. The reason for that is that really BIM and Revit are in the territory of production and we鈥檝e been really careful not to use this software inappropriately. It鈥檚 a very powerful thing. If you鈥檝e got a pull-down menu of different staircases it鈥檚 very easy for the student to just pull one off that is completely inappropriate for the sorts of projects undergraduates are doing.

鈥淲ith Part 1 students we鈥檝e thought long and hard about how we introduce it. We鈥檙e working on the premise that we do some introductory sessions of three or four hours when they鈥檙e timely for a project. So it is part of a module but it鈥檚 not a dedicated BIM module. However, the Part 2 students who have had a few years of practice, they鈥檙e designing their own components in among the suite of ready-mades. They can use it with some form of discrimination.

鈥淲e鈥檝e already got a MSc in BIM that is generally aimed at construction people rather than architects. So what we鈥檙e considering doing is a MSc where we can get people who are working in practice and already have a pretty good knowledge of how the construction in industry works. That鈥檚 potentially more interesting.鈥�

Professor Tom Jeffries

Head of Manchester School of Architecture

At Manchester, BIM is included in a theoretical sense at an undergraduate level with some practical application. At a postgraduate level it is included when appropriate to a student鈥檚 research specialism. The school does not currently offer a dedicated BIM postgraduate qualification.

Firms want people who can make things happen, rather than operatives

鈥淭he question for architecture education is where you bring knowledge of BIM in. We do approach BIM from a theoretical point of view - it鈥檚 raised as a methodological approach - for our undergraduate programmes. So you can imagine a project where a group is working on a single entity that a BIM-type engagement is appropriate. But what we don鈥檛 say is 鈥減retend you鈥檙e putting a building up. Pretend there鈥檚 a structural engineer. Pretend there鈥檚 a services engineer鈥�, because what you end up with is a bad version of reality.

鈥淎nother challenge is that BIM is something that鈥檚 evolving because it鈥檚 still pretty new technology. So you could spend your second year learning the latest version of Revit and by the time you graduate the package will have evolved. I think that at one level firms can鈥檛 expect schools of architecture to train up students in every type of software that might be needed.

鈥淲e don鈥檛 offer any postgraduate courses in BIM specifically at the moment. We have groups of staff who are all engaged in high-level research in different areas and students then elect to engage with those research focuses, which run from heritage to the latest construction methods. And within that research area the necessary skills are introduced so that our graduates can go out and operate in an professional environment effectively.

鈥淭he feedback we have is clear. Firms want people who can make things happen, rather than operatives. Architecture firms and contractors alike want people who can think in a rounded way and bring a level of critical refinement to the production of buildings and architecture.鈥�