好色先生TV

One Hyde Park is probably the UK鈥檚 flashiest job. Located in the heart of Knightsbridge in west London it is a housing scheme for the super rich. Last year a world record was set when one of its apartments was sold for 拢100m. In a market like this, the notion of downturns are meaningless (the super rich, as a rule, don鈥檛 do recessions).

Presumably this is a relief to Candy & Candy, the developer behind the scheme, and the rest of the project team. After all, the Candy brothers鈥� other big schemes, Chelsea Barracks and Noho Square, are both looking distinctly wobbly at the moment. But One Hyde Park is different. It鈥檚 a no-expense-spared job with a project value of 拢490m, which is a hell of a lot of money for 86 apartments on a site less than one hectare in size. Value engineering is not a phrase that is bandied around on this project and according to Nick Williams, Candy & Candy鈥檚 development manager, the team was selected on ability rather than price. 鈥淭his is the best project in the world so we wanted the best team in the world,鈥� he says proudly. 鈥淭here was no tendering; we selected the key subcontractors then agreed a price.鈥�

This also applies to the main contractor, Laing O鈥橰ourke. It鈥檚 a design-and-build contract but with a negotiated figure. Predictably, the specification is top notch; even the concrete used for the structural frame looks posh. So what is it like delivering 鈥渢he best project in the world鈥�?

If selling property is all about location, Candy & Candy has got it sewn up. One Hyde Park is on the junction of Knightsbridge and Sloane Street, which makes it handy for Harrods and Harvey Nichols over the road. The scheme was designed by Rogers Stirk Harbour + Partners and consists of four elongated hexagonal blocks or 鈥減avilions鈥� linked by stair and lift cores (see box, page 51). The idea was to maximise residents鈥� views over Hyde Park at the rear and London to the front. The apartments range in size from 1,000ft2 to penthouses that sprawl over a staggering 27,000ft2. They will come with top-of-the-range kitchens and bathrooms, of course, but bedrooms and living areas will be left for the residents鈥� interior design teams to finish off.

Like any developer, Candy & Candy wanted to build the development as fast as possible to maximise its returns. One complication was that the developer wanted to hand over all the apartments to the owners at the same time, as the sort of people who would live there were hardly likely to tolerate builders drilling and banging away next door.

So some careful planning was called for. A mock-up of an apartment was built in a warehouse in north London to give contractors and specialists an idea of the quality required. 鈥淚t was incredibly informative,鈥� says Paul Lynchehaun, project director for Laing O鈥橰ourke, 鈥渕uch better than a 3D model as you could see and touch it. It helped demystify what was required and helped with the costing.鈥�

The choice of construction method for the real thing was dictated by the programme and the proximity of neighbouring buildings. The Mandarin Oriental hotel is inches away from the east side and a residential block borders it to the west; then there鈥檚 the Piccadilly line, which runs close to the south-eastern corner.

The team opted for top-down construction for the four-storey basement despite its additional cost. This meant sinking a secant pile wall around the basement perimeter, followed by plunge piles: steel columns encased in weak concrete that supported the basement floor slabs. The ground floor slab was cast first, then earth was painstakingly scooped out through holes to create the lower basement floors, which were cast as the excavation proceeded downwards.

The big advantage of this approach was that it meant neighbouring buildings were less likely to move than if conventional bottom-up construction were used. It also meant work could start on the superstructure immediately. 鈥淲e can go up and down at the same time, which saves six months on the programme,鈥� says Lynchehaun. 鈥淲e鈥檒l have topped out the whole development before we finish the basement.鈥�

Unfortunately, the developer鈥檚 plans got stuck in traffic, so to speak. There had been a convoluted arrangement of roundabouts in front of the original sixties office building. These were redundant, so Candy & Candy bought them and added the area to its site, thereby increasing its size by 15%. The snag was that the road junction in front of the plot had to be realigned, and until that was completed, piling could not start on the section of secant wall occupied by the roundabouts.

This meant negotiating with four highway authorities, Transport for London (TfL), the Royal Parks and Westminster and Kensington and Chelsea councils. It took two years to get agreement on the road layout 鈥� then TfL would not let Laing O鈥� Rourke do the work. Piling started on the secant wall in February 2008 and TfL started on the road works in March. These took six months to complete, to the disbelief of the team. 鈥淚t was a nightmare for Candy & Candy and very frustrating for us,鈥� says Lynchehaun. 鈥淲e had to work piecemeal on the secant wall until we got full possession of the site in August.鈥�

Meanwhile, work started on the superstructure where there was access; by August one pavilion and half of two others were up to four floors high. But progress since then has been remarkable thanks to the special concrete frame being used by Laing O鈥橰ourke. 鈥淚t looks simple but a lot of work went into getting it right,鈥� says Lynchehaun.

At first sight the frame looks like a standard insitu concrete job, with post-tensioned floor slabs to minimise their depth. But Candy & Candy did not want ordinary perimeter columns as they would take up space in the apartments. So it made these part of the facade, and finished them to provide a visual link with the stonework of adjacent buildings.

The edge columns are precast concrete with a difference. The mix contained crushed limestone for whiteness and mica for sparkle. This has been acid-etched to give a slightly roughened, stone-like appearance. This looks remarkably sophisticated, but why not just use ordinary concrete columns and overclad them with stone? Because that was anathema to Rogers Stirk Harbour + Partners, which believes strongly in the modernist ideal of honesty in materials. 鈥淐ladding the columns is like dabbing wallpaper all over them; we just don鈥檛 do that,鈥� says partner Graham Stirk. He adds that the precast columns are cost effective as they are faster and simpler to erect: critical on a site with almost no access or storage space.

The two-storeys-high edge columns were erected first, followed by the interior columns, some of which were also precast to save time. Then the shuttering for the floor was put up and the post-tensioned slab cast. The edge columns were strong enough to withstand the tensile forces from the post-tensioned slabs, and to prevent cracking in the middle when the second slab was cast.

The variety of apartment configurations meant that Candy & Candy did not want internal structural walls. Lateral stability was provided by large steel x-shaped, expressed cross-braces. These occupied each floor on either side of each pavilion. The edge columns adjacent to them were made from steel fabricated by Watson Steel. These were shipped to Malling Precast, a Laing O鈥橰ourke specialist company, where they were encased with a special concrete mix, then shipped to site. Once erected the steel cross-braces were bolted onto projecting lugs on the columns.

As the frame moves towards the topping out date in May, the cladding is being installed lower down. This is prefabricated as triple-glazed panels with an interstitial blind. Solid areas have a heavy-duty fibre-reinforced cement board. The prefabricated service modules are beginning to go in and the interior fit-out is just starting. Lynchehaun says it will take 40 weeks to complete each floor, and once these are finished they will be locked off ready for the residents who move into the development in October 2010.

Six months in the park