好色先生TV

Levelling up has been a hot topic on the political agenda for an extended period of time and the West Midlands is one region where there is huge potential for it.

So Birmingham seemed to be the perfect place to explore how the construction industry could benefit from the agenda if investment is made in the right areas.

In the words of David Hopkins, chief executive of Timber Development UK: 鈥溾�楲evelling up鈥� 鈥� if taken seriously and done properly 鈥� offers excellent opportunities but the biggest barrier [is] government not really getting behind it, beyond vacuously repeating the slogan.鈥�

Since the start of the year, the 好色先生TV the Future Commission has been working to discover solutions and initiatives to improve the built environment.

As part of the commission鈥檚 fact-finding work, and in partnership with Constructing Excellence, we are going around the country convening high-level roundtable discussions with experts in different regions to ensure that the commission hears from all corners of the UK.

The first of these saw 好色先生TV gather a group of experts who each had links to the East of England for a chat about skills in a region that some see as living in London鈥檚 shadow. Next we headed to Newcastle to hear from those in the North-east, focusing on net zero and energy.

The third stop was Manchester for a discussion about the work opportunities for built environment firms in the North-west and how they can best deliver the region鈥檚 needs.

The most recent leg of the tour saw us head to Birmingham for a session, sponsored by the Confederation of Timber Industries, on levelling up in the West Midlands and exactly what that means for the construction industry in the region.

The West Midlands panel (listed below), chaired by 好色先生TV鈥檚 head of content Carl Brown, was made up of construction experts from across the supply chain, all of whom have strong connections to the region and a high level of local knowledge and experience.

Commitment is required

Hopkins said the clear barrier to levelling up achieving its potential is that the government is still pursuing too many policies that run counter to its aims, namely the policy of austerity and budget cuts that have been central to its approach since 2010. 鈥淎s an example, investment in local manufacturing when it comes to offsite timber construction has huge opportunities for skilled jobs within it, particularly if you have strong environmental targets within that agenda,鈥� he said. 鈥淏ut I don鈥檛 believe the government is massively committed to this agenda.鈥�

Cem Budak, director and Midlands leader at Arup, agreed on this point, saying that the main difference between the productivity of cities is their infrastructure in the broadest sense and so levelling up gives regions such as the West Midlands and cities like Birmingham the opportunity to 鈥渃atch up鈥� with places like London. But, he added, inconsistent investment from government is most definitely a barrier to this. 鈥淲e need momentum and commitment; it can鈥檛 be start-stop. It doesn鈥檛 need to be everything, but at least a handful of things that allow for sustained planned work.鈥�

On this point, Stephen Crichton, director of project management at Gleeds, said: 鈥淭here is an obvious lack of commitment as we don鈥檛 know what the next stage of levelling up funding is. Is there a next stage? That would be nice to know.鈥�

The need for sustained commitment is something Lovell Partnerships鈥� regional managing director, Stuart Penn, said is integral to estate regeneration 鈥� something he considers to pose a great opportunity for the region if done right. He said: 鈥淒oing proper estate regeneration requires more than what is possible with the current situation. If done properly it helps with skills, as you can get local kids engaged. It inherently helps with issues such as energy poverty, which supports the agenda. But at the moment the central government commitment is not there.鈥�

Local skills

Many around the table agreed that creating local skills and jobs is one of the key potential benefits of levelling up, although several also identified significant current blockers. 鈥淭here are three universities across the Midlands with construction careers courses,鈥� said Tim Bush, equity partner at Baily Garner. 鈥淏ut all three universities have let us down.鈥� He went on to explain that the firm had recently brought in a number of young staff through a part-time degree course pathway, only for the university to cancel their places. A lack of uptake was said to be the reason. 鈥淪omething clearly needs to be done, but what responsibility lies with the industry, what lies with government, and what lies with the institutions? We are trying to do the right thing in developing local skills, but it鈥檚 a concern.鈥�

Rob Lamond, head of strategy and analysis for housing, property and regeneration at the West Midlands Combined Authority (WMCA), said the organisation has been trying to assist in these areas. 鈥淲e鈥檝e tried as WMCA to try and broker certain things such as the development of modular and offsite, but also the education, skills and university piece. It may be an area where we need more focus.鈥�

Mark Wakeford, chairman of EvoEnergy, said there are opportunities there still and that part of the responsibility certainly falls to industry to engage with the institutions. 鈥淲e are going to create an opportunity for an apprenticeship in the solar energy space, but it鈥檚 being driven by industry. We are successful despite government rather than because of it.鈥� He also noted that the further education sector presents a ripe opportunity for the construction sector (see recommendations panel, below).

Fenwick Elliott partner Simon Tolson agreed that investment is required to align education with the construction sector. 鈥淭here needs to be encouragement and pathways at a young level 鈥� and the industry could do more to encourage that in the right, positive way.鈥�

For his part, Richard Whittaker, director of development at Citizen, said it is vital that the focus is on not just recruiting but retraining. 鈥淭here are people who have been on site for decades who have the knowledge and skills to move into roles we need, we need to be doing more to enable that,鈥� he said.

Net zero and levelling up

Robert Lambe, chief executive of Melius Homes, raised the point that the net zero agenda and specifically, panellised offsite manufacturing could be sources of huge benefit to the levelling up agenda. He said: 鈥淭he localism of offsite manufacturing can really help with the levelling up cause as well as having the potential to help tackle the net zero agenda.鈥�

On this point, Andrew Carpenter, director of Confederation of Timber Industries, agreed. 鈥淧anellised systems appear to be the way; volumetric systems don鈥檛 seem to be commercially stacked up at the moment,鈥� he said. 鈥淚f you invest in levelling up in the panellised systems sector at the moment there are mainly local SMEs 鈥� it helps with local jobs and the net zero agenda all in one.鈥� (See recommendations panel, below.)

Cundall sustainability associate director Paul Chatwin added that retrofit and the skills to deliver it are an area that needs to be considered when thinking about levelling up. 鈥淎s an example, airtightness can be harder to achieve in existing stock, but improving things like that are core to developing the skills and buildings needed. There is going to be a big push to make current resources work harder.鈥� He said increased efficiency is core to economic levelling up, particularly in the current economic environment as well as net zero goals.

Planning is key

There was much conversation around the table regarding the need for the planning system to be unlocked to speed up development (see recommendations panel, below). Charlotte El Hakiem, planning director at Marrons, said for that to happen, investment is need. 鈥淩esources are needed in planning now in order to entice people into the profession. There are no real resources available. Resources have become fewer, while the system has become more complex. It鈥檚 a crippling effect.鈥�

She and Citizen鈥檚 Whittaker both saw it as integral that the pre-application process should be streamlined to allow opportunities to be realised more rapidly.

The solutions

As the roundtable approached its conclusion after 90 minutes of robust debate, the panel were asked to produce proposals for the 好色先生TV the Future Commission. Responses (see below) included suggestions around issues and solutions that could feed into maximising the potential of the levelling up agenda.