Birgit Blacklaws
好色先生TVCommercial Marine Piling vs Pierse Contracting: Place of performance
Our legal expert from Fenwick Elliott discusses a question of location
好色先生TVVision Homes vs Lancsville Construction: Jurisdiction
Our Fenwick Elliott expert discusses what happens where two adjudications are brought on the same case
好色先生TVAceramais Holdings vs Hadleigh Partnerships: Contracts in writing
Our Fenwick Elliott expert discusses a dispute over whether there was a contract and writing, and other issues
好色先生TVHS Works vs Enterprise Managed Services: Multiple adjudications
Our Fenwick Elliott expert discusses a case involving two different adjudications and two different adjudicators
好色先生TVChristopher Michael Linnett vs Halliwells: Adjudicator's fees
Can an adjudicator recover fees from a party that raises questions about jurisdiction? Fenwick Elliott discusses
好色先生TVBinding decisions: YCMS vs Stephen and Miriam Grabiner
Fenwick Elliott discusses the adjudicator's jurisdiction
CommentOral agreements
The CaseThe claimant applied for summary judgment to enforce an adjudicator's decision whereby the defendant was ordered to pay 拢12,449.70, plus VAT and interest.
CommentWitholding payment
The CaseThere were a number of issues before the court. The first was whether or not the claimant's application for payment was valid and whether the engineer's certificate was valid.
CommentJurisdiction of the court
The CaseThe defendant invited tenders for building works to convert a hotel back into the family house that it originally was. The claimant鈥檚 tender was successful. At the time the claimant commenced work, there was no contract in place. Thereafter, as the works progressed, there were negotiations between the parties ...
CommentEnterprise Managed Services Limited v East Midland Contracting Limited
The CaseThe Claimant sought to reverse the decision of an adjudicator, by which the adjudicator had decided that the Claimant was obliged to pay the Defendant the sum of 拢1,131,668.29 as damages for breach of contract.
CommentLetter of intent
The CaseThe Defendant wished to have refurbishment and regeneration works carried out to a number of houses and flats on the Clapham Park Estate. The Claimant tendered for these works and a Letter of Intent (鈥淟OI鈥�) was sent to the Claimant in June 2007 recording the Defendant鈥檚 intention to enter ...
CommentCubitt 好色先生TV and Interiors Ltd vs Richardson Roofing (Industrial) Ltd
The CaseThe Claimant, as main contractor, engaged the Defendant as a roofing sub-contractor at a building site at Hampton Wick Riverside.
- Comment
Withholding notices: Aedas Architects vs Skanska Construction UK
This dispute arose out of works done on contracts to renovate some schools in Midlothian. The claimant sought periodical payments but was met with refusal because the Defendant claimed that it had large and on-going contra set-offs which were much more than what the claimant was pursuing.
- Comment
Commencing arbitration: Taylor Woodrow Construction vs RMD Kwikform Ltd
This was an application under sections 32 and 45 of the Arbitration Act 1996 (鈥渢he Act鈥�) to determine a preliminary point of law in relation to arbitral proceedings.
- Comment
Adjudication timetable: Edenbooth Ltd vs Cre8 Developments Ltd
The claimant applied for summary judgment to enforce an adjudicator鈥檚 decision. The defendant was a development company who had engaged the claimant to carry out ground works at two adjacent properties. One of the properties was owned and occupied by a director of the defendant.
- Comment
Non-compliance with pre-action protocol: Orange Personal Communications Services vs Hoare Lee
This judgment arose out of an application by the remaining defendant in the claim, for a stay of the proceedings pending the implementation of the process laid down by the pre-action protocol for construction and engineering disputes.
- Comment
Tendering process: Aquatron Breathing Air Systems vs Strathclyde Fire Board
In March 2004, the defendants, who operate the Strathclyde Fire Brigade, issued an invitation to tender for certain services associated with its breathing apparatus equipment, under the Public Services Contract Regulations 1993 which has now been superseded.
- Comment
Adjudication enforcement: Harris Calnan Construction Co Ltd vs Ridgewood (Kensington) Ltd
The claimant applied for summary judgment arising out of an adjudication decision and claimed for costs on an indemnity basis. In the course of the adjudication the adjudicator rejected the defendant鈥檚 challenge to his jurisdiction, finding that there was a contract in writing between the parties.