Government proposals published alongside the Energy Bill could stimulate market for energy efficiency retrofits in buildings
The government has set out plans to include incentives to reduce energy demand in its reforms of the electricity market, a move which could stimulate work retrofitting existing buildings to make them more efficient.
The government published plans today to allow firms to be paid for saving energy, providing opportunities for those working in this area in the built environment.
The plans form part of its proposals for a capacity market in the electricity sector, which will allow firms to bid to be paid for building capacity to meet peak demand for power, the proposal will see a similar system employed for reducing demand.
The government also published plans for a new supplier obligation requiring power companies to fund energy efficiency measures in the non-domestic sector. Plus, it will float plans for introducing premium payments for each kWh saved through energy efficiency.
Energy minister Greg Barker: 鈥淲e have schemes already in place but there are more avenues to be explored and that鈥檚 what these ambitious proposals, a first for the UK, are designed to do.鈥�
Paul King, UK Green 好色先生TV Council chief executive welcomed the proposals on energy efficiency published by alongside the Energy Bill, which outline plans to reward firms and households that cut their energy use.
He said energy efficiency has traditionally been the 鈥楥inderella鈥� of the energy debate, never given the prominence it deserves in an agenda dominated by the issue of energy generation.
He said: 鈥淎fter some major setbacks for its 鈥楪reenest Government Ever鈥� claims, today鈥檚 announcements are much more encouraging than many - including ourselves - have been expecting.
鈥淚t鈥檚 great to see government bringing forward innovative proposals to reduce energy demand, but of course, it will be critical that they learn lessons from the Feed-In Tariffs debacle and the Carbon Reduction Commitment to ensure that this is done in the right way and provides the certainty industry needs to invest.
鈥淛ust as we need to encourage consumers and providers to make the most of the Green Deal, we need to rally behind the Government鈥檚 efforts to reduce businesses鈥� energy demand too.
鈥淩esearch from McKinsey cited by DECC suggests that a 26% reduction in energy use is possible by 2030 and we need to see this as a realistic target to cut demand, save money and carbon as well as helping us keep the lights on.鈥�
The full proposals were published this morning and the Electricity Demand Reduction consultation will run until 31 January 2013.
The government published details of the main measures in the Energy Bill
Reaction to government鈥檚 Energy Bill
Mike Pigott, UK power sector director at Turner & Townsend, said: 鈥淕as has emerged from the wings to play a surprisingly big role in the diverse mix proposed by the Energy Bill.
鈥淭here鈥檚 every chance that Britain will see a second 鈥榙ash for gas鈥� as gas is cast as the least controversial, quickest to build and most reliable stop-gap source of power.
鈥淣ew nuclear power stations will play a key role too, but the construction timescale they need is too long to address the immediate demand for power that gas will bridge.
鈥淭he bill also recognises the ongoing role of coal fired stations, albeit with the addition of carbon capture and storage technology.
鈥淲hile the green lobby and consumer groups will continue to debate how much the investment in renewables will cost - and whether the prospect of higher energy bills will be worth it - the bill鈥檚 key goal is to provide some genuine certainty to the energy companies.
鈥淭he hard truth is that unless they can feel confident about the future shape of the industry and the energy market, they will not invest the huge sums required to build the new generating capacity that Britain needs to keep the lights on.
鈥淭he Contract for Difference proposals should go a long way to reassure investors that they will get a solid return on their capital costs.
鈥淯ltimately the bill鈥檚 proposals can only be judged a success if the array of low-carbon projects proposed secure not just the funding they need, but are also delivered efficiently.鈥�
David Symons, director at WSP, welcomed the energy efficiency consultation in the Energy Bill but said the challenges were substantial: 鈥淗elping homes and business use less energy is by far the most effective strategy to cut bills and although progress has been made the scale of the challenge is huge.
鈥淭here remains a significant gap between the situation today and the Government鈥檚 aspirations to reduce total energy use by 12% by 2020.
鈥淛ust last month, DECC predicted that with existing policies, total energy use across the UK would barely change over the next 18 years, rising slightly in both domestic (3%) and commercial (9%) sectors. See footnote below
鈥淭here is also a big gap between UK aspirations and targets already in place today in Europe. In Germany, for example there is already a target to reduce energy consumption by 20% by 2020 and by 50% by 2050 compared to 2008.
鈥淔inally, a strong efficiency programme is also essential for homeowners and business because global energy prices are forecast to rise - gas prices by 17% in 2030 and oil by 7%.
鈥淚t does seem strange that the government is launching a major energy efficiency consultation just a week after it launched its energy efficiency strategy, but if the outcome is more action, greater competitiveness, and more saving for homeowners, then this will be more than welcome.鈥�
Mark Stewart, UK head of energy for EC Harris, said: 鈥淚n previous announcements the government has consistently referenced the need to address three primary issues - security of supply, affordability and decarbonisation.
鈥淭he new measures being introduced suggest that keeping the lights on and the economy on an even keel, have trumped the green agenda for the time being.
鈥淭he decision to put off introducing a binding 2030 decarbonisation target before 2016 could unsettle some investors. However, the biggest barrier when it comes to securing private finance will come next year when the government makes a decision on the level of subsidies it makes available for renewables and new-build nuclear schemes.
鈥淥ne thing to look out for is whether further detail is provided on where the 拢7.6bn raised through higher customer bills will be allocated. New-build nuclear will help to provide low-carbon electricity however if most of the capital is allocated to nuclear at the expense of renewables, it will send a negative signal around the government鈥檚 commitment to this important sector.
鈥淭he gas industry appears to be the biggest winner and if a more detailed strategy is included as part of the Autumn Statement, there could be imminent movement in terms of building new CCG plants and gas storage facilities.
鈥淎 focus on gas makes sense in the short-term as it could help deliver the capacity required to keep the lights on, whilst its relative cleanliness compared with thermal based fuels, will enable the government to reduce the UK鈥檚 carbon footprint, albeit at a slower pace.
鈥淭he Bill will also be well received within the nuclear sector as it provides greater certainty around the government鈥檚 commitment to underwriting future new-build nuclear schemes. It鈥檚 no surprise that Hinkley was confirmed shortly after initial detail of the Bill was released, and over the coming months we鈥檙e likely to see an acceleration of support for the Horizon programme as well.鈥�
鈥淭he offshore wind industry had been gearing up to demonstrate the key role it can play in the UK鈥檚 future energy mix however by refusing to set a binding decarbonisation target until after 2016, there鈥檚 a risk some of this momentum could be lost.
鈥淭hat said, most of the investment decisions for Round Three offshore wind development won鈥檛 happen until 2016-17, so all is certainly not lost provided the right levers are introduced in 2016 when the economy is in stronger health.鈥�
John Cridland, CBI director-general, said: 鈥淓nergy-intensive manufacturing is finally getting its place in the sun today, by the exemption from necessary new energy costs. This is vital for such companies to play a key part in our low-carbon economy and it is good news that the government has listened to our calls to build in support at this early stage, which will ensure we reap the full economic benefits at the earliest opportunity.
鈥淓qually important is the welcome boost the bill gives to investor certainty.鈥�
Keith Parker, chief executive of the Nuclear Industry Association, said: 鈥淭he bill provides much needed investment certainty. A major nuclear new build programme will lead to substantial industrial and employment benefits - including considerable opportunities for the UK nuclear supply chain and a boost for UK manufacturing and construction.鈥�
No comments yet