Committee chair admits she 鈥漚bsolutely hated鈥 the prospect of the mixed-use scheme being built

AHMM Baker Street 2a

CGI of AHMM鈥檚 plans for the Baker Street site

Westminster council鈥檚 planning committee has unanimously voted to approve controversial plans by AHMM to demolish and rebuild an entire city block in Marylebone despite several members strongly criticising the mixed-use scheme鈥檚 鈥渘ondescript鈥 design.

In a three hour meeting devoted entirely to the project, committee chair Ruth Bush admitted she was 鈥渄eeply disappointed鈥 by AHMM鈥檚 design proposals for the site and said she 鈥渁bsolutely hated鈥 the prospect of it being built but voted in favour of the plans due to the borough鈥檚 need for grade A office space.

Designed for a joint venture between Derwent London and Lazari Investments with the Portman Estate, the eight-storey scheme would replace a row of five unlisted buildings along Baker Street including the former headquarters of the Special Operations Executive, a government spy agency active during the Second World War.

The proposals, which will still need final sign off by the mayor of London to go ahead, would include 28,000 sq m of office space and 17 homes on what is considered the area鈥檚 last remaining strategic development site.

All councillors on the committee voted in favour of the planning officer鈥檚 recommendation to approve the application in the meeting.

Bush, criticising the design of the scheme, said her vote to approve came 鈥済enuinely with a very heavy heart鈥.

鈥滻 am deeply disappointed by the size and design of this building. I just think the lack of imagination, the lack of sensitivity to what surrounds it鈥 I know we鈥檙e being told how it makes appropriate reference to the conservation area but I think these colossal verticals are completely out of place,鈥 she said, referring to a series of large columns proposed for the facade of the building.

She added: 鈥滻 absolutely hate the idea of this building being up there for 50 odd years or more鈥.but every time we make one of these decisions a building stays for decades and it should. This is too big a building to be where it is in the context of where it is.鈥

Councillor Paul Fisher, who has sat on the committee for more than two years, said the proposal was 鈥渙ne of the most difficult鈥 that he had determined but voted in favour because of the high demand for high quality office space in the Baker Street area.

鈥滻 don鈥檛 like the design. I think it could have done better with the design of this building in the heart of London, but that鈥檚 not the test here,鈥 he said, adding: 鈥滱ll things considered, it would be reckless given the demand for grade A office space for me to reject it.鈥

Councillor Jason Williams described the proposed building as 鈥渞ather nondescript and it could be anywhere鈥, while councillor Laila Cunningham also admitted she did not like the design and said it 鈥漜ould be more refined, more elegant鈥.

But Cunningham said the current site was not sustainable and would need to redeveloped in the future, and AHMM鈥檚 proposals were 鈥漚lmost as good as it gets in terms of sustainability鈥, adding: 鈥淚 fear that a future application may not be鈥.

Westminster鈥檚 planning officers had said the proposals were 鈥渁cceptable from a sustainability and circular economy perspective鈥 in their recommendation to approve because of the applicants鈥 commitment to reuse around 59% of Accurist House, one of the buildings on the site. The new scheme would also have significantly better operational energy performance than the existing buildings.

A council report said reusing the buildings would not be viable because of differing floorplates. While the developers had looked at retaining Accurist House, a study found this would have a comparable upfront carbon impact of redeveloping the whole site.

It is the latest in a string of contentious redevelopment proposals which have come before Westminster鈥檚 planning committee in the last few months following the council鈥檚 announcement of its intention to become a 鈥渞etrofit-first鈥 city.

A committee hearing in April refused plans by Fathom Architects to redevelop a block on Savile Row despite the scheme being deemed compliant with local planning guidance, while a Foster & Partners-designed retrofit in Mayfair was granted approval at the same meeting.

But another demolish and rebuild scheme on Savile Row by PLP was unexpectedly approved by the committee in May despite the proposals being recommended for refusal by planning officers on heritage and sustainability grounds.

The project team for the Baker Street site includes planning consultant Gerald Eve, landscape architect LDA Design, structural engineer Buro Happold, MEP and services engineer Cundall, cost consultant Aecom and project manager Gardiner & Theobald.