好色先生TV

The interim Hackitt report has slammed the current regulatory system as 鈥渘ot fit for purpose in relation to high-rise and complex buildings鈥�.

The , which was undertaken by Dame Judith Hackitt, revealed that 鈥渢here is a clear need for a full overhaul of the regulatory system to address the wide-ranging issues outlined.鈥�

The report, which was commissioned following this summer鈥檚 Grenfell fire, states that it was evident very early in the process that there was 鈥渁 need for significant improvement in the current system in a number of areas.鈥�

These include: regulation and guidance, roles and responsibilities, competence, process, compliance and enforcement; residents鈥� voice and raising concerns, as well as quality assurance and products.

Hackitt labelled the current regulation and guidance as 鈥渂oth complex and unclear鈥�, and declared the 鈥渃larity of roles and responsibilities within the system is poor鈥�.

She said the construction industry, building owners, regulators and government had to work together to address the shortcomings identified so far.

She added: 鈥淚 have found that the regulatory system for safely designing, constructing and managing buildings is not fit for purpose. The current system is highly complex and there is confusion about the roles and responsibilities at each stage. In many areas there is a lack of competence and accreditation.

鈥淲hile this does not mean all buildings are unsafe, it does mean we need to build a more effective system for the future. That is why I am today calling for the construction industry, building owners, regulators and government to come together to identify how to overcome these shortcomings together.

The competency of those involved in the design, construction, ongoing operational management and maintenance of complex and high-risk buildings was also called into question.

The report states: 鈥淭he means of assessing and ensuring appropriate levels of competence throughout the system are unclear and inadequate.鈥� And it said that the testing, marketing and quality assurance of products used in construction need to improve.

The enforcement and sanction measures were also labelled as poor and not providing adequate means of compliance assurance, deterrence or redress for non-compliance.

It also found the route for residents鈥� concerns to be raised and addressed was unclear and inadequate, while classing the current methods for testing, certification and marketing of construction products and systems as unclear.

Moving forward, the second phase of the report, which is set to be released in spring 2018, will focus on defining a revised regulatory system which will be 鈥渟impler, clearer to all involved and deliver better overall outcomes鈥�.

A summit involving government and representatives from the building industry will take place in the New Year ahead of the final report鈥檚 publication..

The independent report was commissioned in August, in the wake of June鈥檚 Grenfell Tower tragedy, where 71 people lost their lives.

Responding to the report鈥檚 publication, Suzannah Nichol MBE, Chief Executive of Build UK said: 鈥淭he interim report of the Independent Review rightly identifies the need for wholesale change across building regulations alongside much needed cultural change within the industry. A focus on clarifying roles and responsibilities across a buildings life cycle, ensuring competence of individuals and examining product testing and marketing reflect the industry鈥檚 views. The construction industry stands ready to support the design and implementation of a regulatory regime fit for the future.鈥�

Peter Caplehorn, Construction Products Association deputy chief executive and policy director, said: 鈥淒ame Judith鈥檚 Independent Review is right to question how the construction sector can address the effectiveness of regulations and regulators. The construction products industry has a vital role to play, leading a culture change鈥�ensuring products are not only properly tested and certified but also marketed in a way that is easy to interpret.鈥�