好色先生TV

The compensation scheme for blacklisted workers will have to be significantly overhauled to become a viable means of resolving the issue, groups representing the workers have said.

In a letter sent earlier this month and seen by 好色先生TV, trade union bosses and the Blacklist Support Group argued that the proposals of the Construction Workers Compensation Scheme (CWCS) do not go far enough given the 鈥測ears of frustration that our blacklisted members have endured鈥�.

The letter was sent to John Taylor, the former Acas boss who is acting on behalf of the CWCS, which represents eight major contractors that used the services of the notorious Consulting Association - Sir Robert McAlpine, Balfour Beatty, Carillion, Costain, Kier, Laing O鈥橰ourke, Skanska and Vinci.

When it launched in October, a statement from the CWCS said it was a genuine attempt to resolve the issue and would make it as 鈥渟imple as possible鈥� for those with legitimate claims to be compensated.

The eight contractors behind it also apologised for their previous involvement with blacklisting firm the Consulting Association 鈥渁nd the impact that its database may have had on any individual construction worker鈥�.

The letter, from GMB national officer Justin Bowden, Unite assistant general secretary Gail Cartmail, Ucatt national officer Jim Kennedy and Blacklist Support Group secretary Dave Smith, calls for 鈥渕eaningful negotiation鈥� but says that the CWCS 鈥渃ould offer some basis upon which to meet and negotiate鈥�.

The letter lists eight key points. These include the demand that the scheme leave the unions free to pursue a formal inquiry and for workers to seek an apology, training and jobs; no cap on compensation despite the scheme鈥檚 initial suggestion of a 拢100,000 cap per individual; and no demand that workers withdraw existing claims as a condition of entering the scheme.

The letter also says that a one-year timescale is insufficient, calls for full disclosure from the companies involved, requests the scheme鈥檚 input on a new statutory code of conduct and queries why other firms that used the Consulting Association are not part of the CWCS.

A CWCS spokesperson declined to comment.