Today 好色先生TV has released episode 3 of its 好色先生TV Talks podcast, dedicating four episodes to interviews with leading names in urban design about their approaches to community-building.
New developments can face massive local opposition, attacked for poor design, a lack of public services and low quality civic space.
These are some of the challenges we will be tackling in this series by talking to professionals about their projects, influences and motivations.
Our guest in today鈥檚 episode is David Rudlin.
David is one of the UK鈥檚 leading urban designers and planning experts. He began his career as a town planner at a time when that role still involved a degree of design responsibility, rather than the increasingly development-management focus it has come to be associated with in recent decades. And the idea of the planner as someone who helps provide a clear strategic direction, and sets high standards for placemaking, is one that David still strongly believes in.
I鈥檝e always said I love modern buildings, but modernist town planning is a disaster
Growing up in Birmingham in the 1970s, David was at first excited and then increasingly disillusioned with the modernist town planning that he saw being implemented around him.
鈥淚鈥檝e always said I love modern buildings, but modernist town planning is a disaster,鈥� says David in the podcast. 鈥淚 also think modernism has a bigger problem in that it doesn鈥檛 wear well, whereas traditional places actually get better as they get older - all the incremental change adds to their character. I think modernism looks best on the first days its opened and then deteriorates thereafter.鈥�
David鈥檚 interest in the built environment and his belief that there was a better way to do urbanism, led him to study planning in Manchester, a city with which he has had a close relationship ever since. Like many good architects and urban designers, attachment to a specific location has been critical to his professional outlook. David has been in Manchester throughout its rebirth and emergence as a leading European city and has played a leading role in some of its key developments, including the regeneration of Hume.
When asked for an example of a place that has got the creating communities and placemaking agenda right, David points to Manchester, referencing the learning curve the city has been on from the earliest days of its bid to win the Olympics, to its emergence as a thriving hub that is drawing in talent and investment from across the UK and further afield.
鈥淢anchester is a great case study I think. There鈥檚 a story about the process in Manchester which begins when they were bidding for the Olympic games鈥�, he says of the city.
鈥淎nd when the senior people went to Barcelona as part of that process they realised that Manchester was just awful compared to Barcelona, and that it wasn鈥檛 just the cathedrals and concert halls, it was just the basic quality of urban realm in the city.鈥�
He believes the country still has a long way to go to embed good basic standards of urban design
The belief that British cities have much to learn from looking at successful international case studies has been an important part of David鈥檚 approach, and one of the ideas that led him to spend several years working for Urbed, an innovative urban design and research company, that has helped change attitudes to the way that people look at and think about cities in the UK.
David鈥檚 career spans not only a period of massive change for Manchester, but seismic shifts in planning, housebuilding and placemaking across the UK. Looking back her observes how 鈥淭he Thatcher government didn鈥檛 have a lot of time for planning. They saw it as an interference with the free market, so planning was very much downgraded as a profession.鈥�
鈥淎 few years before my time town planners had been heroes. They鈥檇 been the people changing the world, and envisaging the future and building these modernist town centres. And so in a sense planners went from heroes to being slightly irrelevant鈥�, says David. 鈥淎nd I don鈥檛 think either is justified. I don鈥檛 think the hero planner is a useful idea, but neither is the bureaucratic person, just pushing planning applications across a desk. We need to find a middle ground and I think planning has a real role to rediscover.鈥�
More recently David has led on the creation of the National Model Design Code. He believes the country still has a long way to go to embed good basic standards of urban design, but that design codes could play a crucial role in helping create quality new places, and in reinforcing what鈥檚 good about existed towns and cities.
But he is also deeply aware of the resourcing issues that local authorities face and the need to properly support the UK鈥檚 planning system so that it can enable good quality development and investment: 鈥淭his idea of a planning system where we can only refuse something rather than come up with something that鈥檚 good has left us with a system that鈥檚 not really fit for purpose. We need to reform our planning system quite badly. 鈥�
>> Also listen to: In conversation with Jo Wright at Perkins & Will
>> In conversation with Selina Mason at Lendlease
Last week鈥檚 guest was Selina Mason at Lendlease, and next week we will be talking to Anna Mansfield at Publica. These interviews are part of 好色先生TV the Future Commission鈥檚 focus on creating communities, and the podcast is co-hosted by 好色先生TV鈥檚 architectural editor Ben Flatman and 好色先生TV鈥檚 editor Chloe McCulloch.
You can hear episode 3 of the podcast series by clicking on the player at the top of the story and below. And if you wish to subscribe so that you receive each podcast in the series at the time of release each Tuesday, then go to one of the main podcast providers such as and .
No comments yet