Former mayor uses GLA hearing to attack his successor

Boris Johnson answering questions on the Garden Bridge at GLA oversight committee

Boris Johnson answering questions on the Garden Bridge at GLA oversight committee

Boris Johnson claimed he 鈥渄idn鈥檛 waste a single penny of taxpayer鈥檚 money鈥 over his failed Garden Bridge project.

Instead he blamed his successor for the loss of 拢46m of public money on the grounds that it was Sadiq Khan who pulled the plug on the troubled project 鈥渃ompletely unnecessarily鈥.

The foreign secretary was speaking after being ordered to attend the London Assembly鈥檚 oversight committee yesterday, the first mayor to be summonsed in its history.

He accepted mayors should be accountable for expenditure but said he would have built the bridge, which was due to be built by Bouygues and Italian steel firm Cimolai, if he had still been in office.

鈥淎las it鈥檚 money down the drain until someone comes along and rescues the project,鈥 he said.

He spent much of the hour-long session at City Hall making jokes and attacking Khan and Margaret Hodge, who wrote a scathing report three weeks before the bridge, designed by Heatherwick Studio, was canned.

Johnson said Hodge鈥檚 review, with which he refused to co-operate, was full of 鈥減eculiarities鈥 such as being held in a private room and suffering confusions over transcripts, blaming these for his decision not to attend.

He said: 鈥淚t was a fairly gimcrack affair, unlike the Garden Bridge which would have been a beautiful piece of engineering and would have stood the test of time.鈥

He also drew in other people to his answers, such as former TfL commissioner Peter Hendy and then-chancellor George Osborne who, he said, saw the bridge鈥檚 merits.

He said Hendy told him earlier this week that the case for the Garden Bridge was stronger than that for the Rotherhithe bridge, which has also become mired in controversy. 鈥淎m I right in thinking the current mayor is going to spent 200 million squid on a footbridge for which there is no case whatsoever,鈥 he added.

Heatherwick & Arup's Garden Bridge view

Later in the hearing Johnson defended the Garden Bridge鈥檚 much-criticised procurement process despite a number of other inquiries which found 鈥渟erious errors that compromised its fairness鈥, in the words of chairman Len Duvall.

Wilkinson Eyre and Marks Barfield were both encouraged to submit design proposals for a bridge but only given days to do so, while Heatherwick had already spent months on the project. The brief made no mention of a garden although Johnson and supporters were already fundraising for a garden bridge based on the vision created by Heatherwick and actress Joanna Lumley.

Johnson claimed he was sceptical at start but was eventually persuaded there was a transport and regeneration case.

Crop boris johnson at gla oversight committee(12)

鈥淲e then realised if we wanted to go ahead we had to procure it properly. As you know there are very strict rules about how that can be done so it was necessary to have a procurement process and competition. We genuinely did that in a spirit of openness.鈥

Duvall asked Johnson about an email sent by a TfL official saying: 鈥淚 approached Thomas Heatherwick today and asked what kind of procurement exercise he would like TfL to take鈥.

鈥淣o other participants were given that opportunity,鈥 said Duvall. 鈥淲as this process fair, open and honest?鈥

Johnson said he hadn鈥檛 seen the email but admitted the process involved 鈥渂its and pieces that were rough around the edges鈥 because of the speed required. He also said many TfL staff had been 鈥渞eprehensibly鈥 maligned.

He defended a fundraising trip to San Francisco with Heatherwick, saying: 鈥淲hen you need to get a great project off the ground and you need sponsorship there鈥檚 a bit of a chicken and egg problem. The role of Joanna Lumley and Thomas Heatherwick at that stage was simply to be champions for the concept 鈥 and a very good concept it was.鈥 He hoped their 鈥渆loquence and passion鈥 would make potential backers 鈥渟ay wow鈥.

He repeatedly claimed the bridge would have been a 鈥渢riumph for this city鈥, adding: 鈥淚t鈥檚 a bitter disappointment to me now that it鈥檚 no longer proceeding. It鈥檚 not a decision I would have taken. When I left office 拢36m had been spent. My successor鈥 blew hot and cold鈥 and in the interim a further cost was racked up of 拢9m.鈥 He suggested Khan had dropped the bridge because it 鈥渨asn鈥檛 his baby鈥.

Johnson will now be asked to provide a written response to questions he failed to answer from Tom Copley about why he had watered down conditions relating to the bridge鈥檚 operational costs.